To provoke a witness into offering more information than allowed, which tactic might be employed?

To provoke a witness into offering more information than is typically allowed, using suggestive questioning can be particularly effective. This tactic involves framing questions in a way that nudges the witness toward a specific response or encourages them to elaborate based on implied cues. For instance, suggestive questions can include assumptions or lead the witness toward a certain narrative, prompting them to provide additional details they might not have volunteered otherwise.

The other options do not inherently serve the same purpose. Staring can create discomfort rather than encourage more information. Rapid-fire questions might overwhelm the witness, leading to confusion or miscommunication rather than eliciting detailed responses. Friendly counsel may create a supportive environment but does not necessarily provoke the witness to disclose more information than allowed. Therefore, suggestive questioning stands out as the most effective method in this context for eliciting additional, potentially useful information from a witness.